Comparison of the SomnoGuard® series of oral appliances

with information based on clinical research and experience from customers‘ feedback

Feature	SomnoGuard®	SomnoGuard® 2.0
Efficacy ¹	good (when fitted correctly)	good (when fitted correctly)
Tolerability	good	good
Ease of fitting ²	relatively easy	relatively easy
Refits possible	1 to max. 3 times	1 to max. 3 times
Nose breathing required	partial	partial
Lateral lower jaw movement possible	no	no
Mouth breathing possible	very little	very little
Retention ³ (grip to teeth)	enough	enough
Lower jaw advancement / adjustable	0 to 5 mm upon fitting	0 to 5 mm upon fitting
Average longevity (subject to normal use)	approx. 1 year	approx. 1 year
Vertical bite opening ⁴	2 to 3 mm	4 to 5 mm

More info available on the Questions and Answers page
Comments: 1) Efficacy is what counts predominantly. Efficacy is characterized by reduction of snoring and breathing arrests due to obstructive sleep apnea to a level that is not dangerous. 2) Fitting quality determines treatment outcome. Even inexperienced people can obtain good fitting results with the 2-part SomnoGuard AP and SP; fitting of the 1-part devices SomnoGuard and SomnoGuard 2.0 is more difficult, and fitting quality depends more on experience. 3) Retention is not essential for efficacy. If necessary, mouth breathers can use a chin-up strip to keep the mouth closed when sleeping. 4) Vertical bite opening means the distance between the incisors with the device in place.

Comparison of the SomnoGuard® series of oral appliances

For detailed product information,use the links at the top of the page

For detailed product information,
use the links at the top of the page